Editorial policy
Our Insights, News and Guides are written for people who make decisions about cyber risk: security teams, CISOs, finance and the board. This is how we make sure they are accurate, current and useful.
Who writes and reviews our content
Every article names its author. Where an article says it has been reviewed, it names the reviewer and the date. Author pages list each person's role and only the credentials they actually hold. [Placeholder: describe your writers and reviewers.]
How we keep content current
Each article shows when it was published, when it was last updated and when it was last reviewed. [Placeholder: how often you review guides, e.g. at least once a year, and when guidance or law changes.]
Sources
We rely on primary sources, such as the National Cyber Security Centre, the Information Commissioner's Office, GOV.UK, regulators and standards bodies, and we list them under each article. We do not publish statistics without a named source.
Independence
We are paid by the specialists, insurers and brokers we introduce (see How we work). [Placeholder: confirm, for example, that partners do not pay to appear in or change editorial content, and that articles do not rank or recommend named insurers.]
Use of AI tools
[Placeholder: say whether and how AI tools are used in research or drafting, and that a named person checks every article before it is published.]
Insurance, legal and financial topics
We explain how things generally work. We do not give insurance, legal or financial advice. For a specific policy, speak to an authorised insurer or broker. For your legal duties, speak to a lawyer.
Corrections
If you spot an error, email [Placeholder: corrections email address]. We correct factual errors and note significant corrections at the end of the article.